Call for Workshops

Workshop & Tutorial Deadline

Proposal Submission
October 22, 2026

Submission Materials

Proposals must be submitted using the official template and sent directly to the workshops team.

Proposal Template ⬇ Download Template
Submit toworkshops@robosoft27.com

Overview and Deadlines

We invite proposals for workshops and tutorials, offered as either half-day or full-day sessions. Workshops and tutorials are a key component of the IEEE RoboSoft conference, providing an opportunity for researchers to share and discuss the latest advances, emerging topics, and future directions with the soft robotics community.

These sessions are intended to complement the main conference programme by allowing attendees to explore specific topics in greater depth, engage in interactive discussions, and develop new skills.

  • Workshop/Tutorial Proposal Deadline: 22 October 2026
  • All times are in GMT (UTC+0). Deadlines close at 4:00 p.m. on the stated date.

Two days of workshops and tutorials will be held at the beginning of the conference. The programme will consist of:

Day 1
Two concurrent half-day workshops/tutorials
(4 hours each)
Day 2
Concurrent full-day workshops/tutorials
(7 hours each)

Proposals will be peer-reviewed and competitively selected based on their relevance to the conference theme, expected impact on the community, quality of planning, and contribution to topic and participant diversity. We particularly encourage proposals that include novel formats, interactive activities, discussion-based sessions, and opportunities for student engagement.

To ensure broad community participation, invited speakers may present in no more than two workshops. Organizers are asked to confirm this with invited speakers. We strongly encourage the inclusion of emerging researchers and voices that are less frequently represented within the community.

Letters of endorsement from Technical Committees (TCs) are not required and will not be considered during the review process.

Inclusivity Matters

As part of our commitment to diversity and inclusion, we encourage organizers to consider diversity in nationality, gender, geography, career stage, and experience when selecting co-organizers, presenters, invited speakers, and tutorial instructors.

Workshops

We encourage workshop proposals that explore active, emerging, or controversial topics in soft robotics, including research, education, and community-focused themes. Workshops should foster discussion, encourage brainstorming, promote student participation, and stimulate new ideas and collaborations within the field.

Tutorials

If you have expertise in a particular area of soft robotics—whether in research, teaching, or community engagement—we encourage you to submit a tutorial proposal. Tutorials should provide participants with an engaging learning experience that combines conceptual understanding with practical knowledge.

Submission

To submit a workshop or tutorial proposal, please complete the proposal template:

Proposals should be submitted via email to:
workshops@robosoft27.com

Reviewer Guidelines / Selection Criteria

All proposals will undergo peer review. Reviewers are encouraged to provide constructive, long-form feedback. Proposals must satisfy the requirements outlined in the submission template to be considered.

Selection will also seek to ensure a balanced programme covering a diverse range of topics across soft robotics while aligning with the conference theme. The evaluation criteria are designed to fairly assess both traditional workshop formats and innovative proposals that introduce new ways of engaging participants and advancing the field.

Strong proposals should satisfy all criteria and demonstrate excellence in one or more areas.

Relevance to the Community
Below ExpectationsTopic is not relevant to the soft robotics community.
Meets ExpectationsTopic is relevant to a subset or the broader community.
Evidence of Preparation
Below ExpectationsMissing required information or insufficient detail.
Meets ExpectationsWell organised and meets the submission requirements.
Exceeds ExpectationsExceptionally well prepared, with detailed planning (e.g., agenda, website, confirmed speakers).
Diversity of Speakers and Format
Below ExpectationsLittle or no evidence of diversity in speakers, activities, or session formats.
Meets ExpectationsDemonstrates some diversity.
Exceeds ExpectationsStrong commitment to diverse perspectives, speakers, and interactive formats.
Cohesiveness of Speakers, Activities, and Format
Below ExpectationsLimited alignment between objectives, speakers, and activities.
Meets ExpectationsComponents are generally well aligned and appropriately justified.
Exceeds ExpectationsStrongly integrated programme with clear rationale and innovative elements.
Interactive Elements
Below ExpectationsMinimal or no opportunities for participant interaction.
Meets ExpectationsIncludes standard interactive components (e.g., panels, poster sessions, discussions).
Exceeds ExpectationsIncorporates tailored or innovative activities that significantly enhance engagement.
Student Participation
Below ExpectationsStudent engagement is absent or only briefly mentioned.
Meets ExpectationsIncludes standard opportunities for student participation (e.g., Q&A, posters, panels).
Exceeds ExpectationsProvides dedicated, meaningful activities that actively support and engage students.